Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArriaga González, Jonathan
dc.creatorArriaga González, Jonathan; 268989
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-17T10:39:17Zen
dc.date.available2015-08-17T10:39:17Zen
dc.date.issued2010-05-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11285/570216en
dc.description.abstractRobot manipulators play an important role in actual industrial processes. The trajectory following of robot manipulators is a non-linear problem that still requires much research [34]. This research work focuses on the control of the dynamics of an articulated robot manipulator. A 2 degree-of-freedom (DOF) articulated robot manipulator is simulated, each of the two links of the robot having its respective controller. Two different kind of control objectives for the robot's links are considered, position control and velocity control. Four control schemes for the robot's dynamics were selected. For position, a PID Controller [24] and a Fuzzy Self-tuning (FST) PID Controller [14] are considered. On the other hand, for velocity control the FST PD+ Controller [35] and the Fuzzy Sliding Mode (FSM) Controller [12, 16, 28] were chosen. Controller's performance and robustness in relevant tasks are evaluated and compared in order to determine which control scheme fits best for each task. Empirical adjustment of most controller's parameters always depend on the time and tests invested in tuning the controller, it is time consuming and subject to human error. As a fair comparison is intended, controller's parameters are optimized via Genetic Algorithms [22]. With this method, the tuning of parameters is not subtle to human error and the comparison can avoid possible erroneous conclusions. Optimization of parameters of all controllers was carried out successfully. Pa-rameters set by the GA are interpreted and show several details about the structure of the considered controllers. Performance comparison of controllers is discussed and conclusions about the complexity of controllers and its equivalence when performing some tasks is presented.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherInstituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey
dc.relationInvestigadoreses_MX
dc.relationEstudianteses_MX
dc.relation.isFormatOfversión publicadaes_MX
dc.relation.isreferencedbyREPOSITORIO NACIONAL CONACYT
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0*
dc.subject.classificationArea::INGENIERÍA Y TECNOLOGÍA::CIENCIAS TECNOLÓGICAS::TECNOLOGÍA DE LOS ORDENADORES::LENGUAJES ALGORÍTMICOSes_MX
dc.titleA comparison of control schemes for an articulated 2 degree-of-freedom robot manipulator optimized via genetic algorithms
dc.typeTesis de Maestría / master Thesis
dc.contributor.departmentTecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Monterreyen
dc.contributor.committeememberSoto, Rogelioes
dc.contributor.committeememberMeza, José Luises
dc.contributor.committeememberRodríguez, Ernestoes
refterms.dateFOA2018-03-24T18:31:53Z
refterms.dateFOA2018-03-24T18:31:53Z
html.description.abstractRobot manipulators play an important role in actual industrial processes. The trajectory following of robot manipulators is a non-linear problem that still requires much research [34]. This research work focuses on the control of the dynamics of an articulated robot manipulator. A 2 degree-of-freedom (DOF) articulated robot manipulator is simulated, each of the two links of the robot having its respective controller. Two different kind of control objectives for the robot's links are considered, position control and velocity control. Four control schemes for the robot's dynamics were selected. For position, a PID Controller [24] and a Fuzzy Self-tuning (FST) PID Controller [14] are considered. On the other hand, for velocity control the FST PD+ Controller [35] and the Fuzzy Sliding Mode (FSM) Controller [12, 16, 28] were chosen. Controller's performance and robustness in relevant tasks are evaluated and compared in order to determine which control scheme fits best for each task. Empirical adjustment of most controller's parameters always depend on the time and tests invested in tuning the controller, it is time consuming and subject to human error. As a fair comparison is intended, controller's parameters are optimized via Genetic Algorithms [22]. With this method, the tuning of parameters is not subtle to human error and the comparison can avoid possible erroneous conclusions. Optimization of parameters of all controllers was carried out successfully. Pa-rameters set by the GA are interpreted and show several details about the structure of the considered controllers. Performance comparison of controllers is discussed and conclusions about the complexity of controllers and its equivalence when performing some tasks is presented.
dc.identificator7
dc.identificator33
dc.identificator3304
dc.identificator120302


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as openAccess